Instructions

navpers 1616/25 counseling chit instruction

Navpers 1616/25 Counseling Chit Instruction: A Comprehensive Overview (Updated 12/24/2025)

Today‚ December 24‚ 2025‚ the official NAVPERS 1616/25 form’s availability is uncertain‚ following the cancellation of MILSPERMAN 1910-204 and transition to 1070-320.

While not formally listed‚ its legacy persists as a record of enlisted counseling‚ impacting evaluations for E1-E6 personnel‚ and requiring careful documentation.

Historical Context and Cancellation of MILSPERMAN 1910-204

Historically‚ the NAVPERS 1616/25 counseling chit instruction was formally outlined within MILSPERMAN 1910-204. This manual provided the governing guidance for conducting and documenting counseling sessions for Navy personnel. However‚ a significant shift occurred with the cancellation of MILSPERMAN 1910-204‚ leaving a void in readily accessible‚ official instruction regarding the form’s usage.

The removal of this directive prompted a search for the current governing instruction‚ leading to MILSPERMAN 1070-320 as a potential starting point for understanding the updated procedures. Despite the cancellation‚ the form itself continued to be utilized‚ creating a period of ambiguity regarding its official status. It’s crucial to understand that simply removing a form from a catalog doesn’t equate to formal cancellation; legality hinges on availability through official channels like the MyNavyHR NAVPERS forms page;

This transition highlights the dynamic nature of Navy regulations and the importance of staying current with policy changes.

Transition to MILSPERMAN 1070-320

Following the cancellation of MILSPERMAN 1910-204‚ the Navy transitioned to MILSPERMAN 1070-320 as the primary source for guidance on personnel management‚ including counseling procedures. However‚ the relationship between this new manual and the continued use of the NAVPERS 1616/25 form wasn’t immediately clear. Initial investigations suggested that 1070-320 might contain the updated instructions‚ but a direct‚ explicit reference to the counseling chit proved elusive.

This transition period required personnel to engage in further “sleuthing” to determine the correct procedures. The absence of a clear directive raised questions about the form’s legality and proper application. Despite the ambiguity‚ the form remained in use‚ emphasizing the need for updated guidance to ensure consistent and compliant counseling practices across the fleet.

Understanding this shift is vital for accurate documentation.

Current Status: Official Availability and MyNavyHR

As of December 24‚ 2025‚ the official status of the NAVPERS 1616/25 form remains ambiguous. While not explicitly cancelled‚ it is no longer prominently listed within the official NAVPERS forms page on MyNavyHR. This absence raises concerns regarding its current legal standing and authorized use. The core principle governing form legality within the Navy dictates that official forms must be accessible through the designated MyNavyHR portal.

Despite this lack of official listing‚ anecdotal evidence suggests continued usage throughout the fleet. This discrepancy highlights a potential gap in communication and standardization. Personnel are advised to verify local instructions and consult with their chain of command regarding the appropriate counseling documentation procedures.

Accessing MyNavyHR is crucial for updates.

The Purpose of the NAVPERS 1616/25 Form

The NAVPERS 1616/25‚ often referred to as a “counseling chit‚” serves as official documentation of counseling sessions conducted with Sailors. Its primary function is to address and record performance issues‚ deficiencies in training‚ or concerns regarding personal conduct. This form isn’t punitive; rather‚ it’s designed as a proactive tool for mentorship and improvement.

It facilitates a structured conversation between the Sailor and counselor‚ outlining specific areas needing attention and collaboratively developing a plan for corrective action. Properly completed chits contribute to a Sailor’s overall evaluation record‚ particularly for those in paygrades E1-E6‚ and demonstrate a commitment to professional development.

Ultimately‚ it aims to enhance readiness.

Key Information Required on the Form

The NAVPERS 1616/25 demands meticulous completion‚ requiring both Sailor and counselor identifying details. This includes the Sailor’s full name‚ grade‚ division‚ and Social Security Number (SSN). Crucially‚ the counselor must also provide their name and grade.

A core component involves selecting the pertinent reason(s) for counseling from a provided checklist – encompassing performance responsibilities‚ OJT progress‚ career advancement‚ dependent support‚ and personal behavior.

Beyond selections‚ a detailed narrative explaining the “Reasons Which Caused the Counseling Requirement” is essential‚ demanding factual details‚ a sequence of events‚ and specific dates. This forms the basis for a collaborative plan.

Sailor’s Identifying Information

Accurate Sailor identification is paramount on the NAVPERS 1616/25. The form necessitates the Sailor’s complete legal name – Last‚ First‚ and Middle Initial – ensuring clarity and avoiding ambiguity. Their current military grade must be precisely stated‚ reflecting their rank at the time of counseling.

Furthermore‚ the Sailor’s assigned division‚ work center‚ and specific duty section are critical for contextualizing the counseling. Most importantly‚ the Sailor’s Social Security Number (SSN) is a required field‚ serving as a unique identifier for record-keeping purposes.

This detailed information establishes a clear link between the counseling session and the individual receiving it‚ ensuring accountability and proper documentation within the Navy’s personnel system.

Counselor’s Identifying Information

Just as crucial as the Sailor’s details‚ the NAVPERS 1616/25 requires comprehensive identification of the counselor providing the guidance. The form demands the counselor’s full name – Last‚ First‚ and Middle Initial – establishing accountability for the session’s content and recommendations.

Equally important is the counselor’s current military grade‚ clearly indicating their rank and authority. The counselor’s assigned division‚ work center‚ or duty section must also be specified‚ providing context for their role and responsibilities.

This information ensures transparency and allows for easy verification of the counselor’s qualifications and position within the Navy’s chain of command‚ supporting a robust counseling process.

Common Reasons for Counseling (Checklist)

The NAVPERS 1616/25 form incorporates a checklist of frequently encountered reasons necessitating counseling sessions. These cover a broad spectrum of potential issues impacting a Sailor’s performance and well-being. Key areas include Performance Responsibilities‚ addressing shortcomings in duty execution.

On-the-Job Training (OJT) Progress is another common trigger‚ ensuring Sailors are developing necessary skills. Career Advancement concerns‚ like lack of progress or planning‚ also warrant discussion. Support of Dependents issues‚ potentially affecting readiness‚ are included.

Furthermore‚ the checklist addresses Personal Behavior and even Private Indebtedness‚ recognizing their potential impact. An “Other” option allows for documenting unique situations‚ ensuring comprehensive coverage.

Performance Responsibilities

Counseling related to Performance Responsibilities‚ documented via NAVPERS 1616/25‚ addresses discrepancies between expected standards and actual execution of duties. This encompasses failures to meet work center expectations‚ consistent errors‚ or a lack of initiative. It’s crucial to detail specific instances of substandard performance‚ avoiding vague generalizations.

The counseling session should focus on identifying the root causes – inadequate training‚ lack of understanding‚ or motivational issues – and collaboratively developing a corrective action plan. Documentation must include clear‚ factual details outlining the performance gap and the agreed-upon steps for improvement.

Effective counseling in this area aims to restore satisfactory performance and prevent recurrence‚ contributing to overall unit readiness.

On-the-Job Training (OJT) Progress

Utilizing NAVPERS 1616/25‚ counseling regarding On-the-Job Training (OJT) Progress addresses instances where a Sailor isn’t meeting established OJT milestones. This includes slow progress‚ difficulty grasping concepts‚ or a lack of proactive engagement in the training process. Documentation requires specific details regarding the OJT task‚ observed deficiencies‚ and the Sailor’s demonstrated understanding.

Counseling should collaboratively identify obstacles hindering progress – insufficient resources‚ inadequate mentorship‚ or personal challenges – and formulate a revised training plan. The plan must outline specific‚ measurable‚ achievable‚ relevant‚ and time-bound (SMART) goals.

Regular follow-up and documentation of progress are vital to ensure successful OJT completion;

Career Advancement

The NAVPERS 1616/25 form facilitates counseling related to Career Advancement when a Sailor exhibits behaviors hindering their professional growth. This includes a lack of initiative in seeking advancement opportunities‚ failing to meet prerequisites for advancement‚ or consistently receiving unfavorable evaluation traits impacting promotion potential.

Counseling sessions should objectively assess the Sailor’s career goals‚ identify skill gaps‚ and develop a plan to address them. This plan might involve pursuing further education‚ completing required qualifications‚ or improving performance in current duties.

Documenting specific actions and timelines is crucial for tracking progress and demonstrating a commitment to advancement.

Support of Dependents

The NAVPERS 1616/25 form addresses counseling concerning Support of Dependents when a Sailor’s actions negatively impact their family’s well-being or financial stability. This includes issues like neglecting financial responsibilities‚ creating an unstable home environment‚ or demonstrating behaviors detrimental to dependent’s welfare.

Counseling should focus on identifying the root causes of these issues and developing a plan for improvement. Resources like Fleet and Family Support Centers can be invaluable in providing financial counseling‚ parenting classes‚ or other support services.

Documentation must be sensitive and focus on behaviors‚ not judgments‚ emphasizing the Sailor’s responsibility to provide for their dependents.

Personal Behavior

The Personal Behavior section of the NAVPERS 1616/25 form addresses conduct impacting a Sailor’s suitability for naval service or reflecting poorly on the Navy. This encompasses a broad range of issues‚ from minor infractions to more serious misconduct‚ requiring documented counseling;

Counseling should detail specific instances of unacceptable behavior‚ avoiding vague accusations. Focus on the impact of the behavior on unit cohesion‚ mission readiness‚ or the Sailor’s professional reputation.

Corrective action plans should emphasize expectations for future conduct and available resources‚ like counseling services or leadership mentorship‚ to facilitate positive change and prevent recurrence.

Detailed Explanation of “Reasons Which Caused the Counseling Requirement”

This crucial section of the NAVPERS 1616/25 demands a thorough‚ factual account of events necessitating counseling. Vague statements are unacceptable; specificity is paramount. Counselors must articulate a clear sequence of events‚ including precise dates and detailed observations.

Avoid subjective interpretations or assumptions. Stick to verifiable facts and direct quotes when possible. The explanation should objectively describe the Sailor’s actions or omissions‚ outlining how they deviated from established standards or expectations.

This detailed narrative forms the foundation for constructive dialogue and a collaborative plan for improvement‚ ensuring the Sailor understands the basis for the counseling.

The Importance of Factual Details and Specific Dates

The NAVPERS 1616/25 form hinges on the inclusion of precise‚ verifiable information. Generalizations or approximations undermine the document’s credibility and legal defensibility. Specific dates – month‚ day‚ and year – are non-negotiable‚ establishing a clear timeline of events.

Detailed descriptions of incidents‚ behaviors‚ or performance deficiencies are equally vital. Avoid ambiguous language; instead‚ employ concrete examples. This level of detail demonstrates thoroughness and objectivity‚ protecting both the Sailor and the counselor.

Accurate record-keeping ensures a fair and transparent process‚ fostering trust and facilitating meaningful corrective action. Without these details‚ the counseling loses its impact.

Plan Development Section: Collaborative Approach

The “Plan Developed By…” section of the NAVPERS 1616/25 isn’t a unilateral decree; it demands a collaborative effort between the Sailor and counselor. This isn’t about imposing solutions‚ but jointly crafting a path to improvement.

Effective plans are specific‚ measurable‚ achievable‚ relevant‚ and time-bound (SMART). They outline concrete steps the Sailor will take‚ with clearly defined timelines for completion. The counselor’s role is to guide‚ offer resources‚ and ensure the plan is realistic.

Mutual agreement and documented signatures signify commitment. Regular follow-up and adjustments are crucial‚ demonstrating ongoing support and a dedication to the Sailor’s success.

NSN (National Stock Number) and Form Identification: 0106-LF-010-1000

The NAVPERS 1616/25 is uniquely identified by its National Stock Number (NSN): 0106-LF-010-1000. This alphanumeric code is vital for inventory management and procurement within the Navy’s logistical systems.

This NSN confirms the form’s authenticity and ensures the correct version is utilized. Despite recent changes in governing instructions – the cancellation of MILSPERMAN 1910-204 and shift to 1070-320 – the NSN remains a consistent identifier.

However‚ the form’s current official availability is questionable‚ with some sources indicating it’s no longer listed on the NAVPERS forms page of MyNavyHR. Nevertheless‚ the NSN provides a traceable link to its historical usage.

Navpers 1616/25 5-90: Significance of the Designation

The “5-90” designation appended to NAVPERS 1616/25 signifies the form’s revision date – May 1990. This indicates the version was current as of that time‚ reflecting the standards and requirements for counseling documentation prevalent then.

However‚ given the cancellation of MILSPERMAN 1910-204 and the transition to MILSPERMAN 1070-320‚ the 5-90 version may not align with current Navy policy. It’s crucial to verify if updated versions or alternative forms are now mandated.

Despite potential obsolescence‚ understanding the “5-90” designation is important when encountering older records or referencing historical counseling documentation. The NSN (0106-LF-010-1000) remains a key identifier‚ but the revision date provides context.

Record of Enlisted Counseling: Official Documentation

The NAVPERS 1616/25 form serves as official documentation of counseling sessions for enlisted personnel (E1-E6). It’s a critical component of the Navy’s performance management and corrective action processes‚ impacting evaluations and career progression.

Proper completion‚ detailing factual events‚ specific dates‚ and a collaboratively developed plan‚ is paramount. This record supports constructive feedback‚ addresses deficiencies‚ and tracks progress towards improvement.

Although its official listing on the NAVPERS form library is currently unclear‚ its historical significance remains. Maintaining accurate records is vital‚ even as counseling procedures evolve‚ ensuring fairness and transparency within the Navy’s disciplinary and developmental framework.

Relationship to Other Navy Forms (NAVFORM 1650)

The NAVPERS 1616/25 counseling chit‚ while a distinct document‚ often works in conjunction with the NAVFORM 1650‚ the Enlisted Evaluation Report. Counseling documented on the 1616/25 can directly inform the narrative portions of the 1650‚ particularly regarding performance improvements or sustained deficiencies.

A well-maintained 1616/25 provides supporting evidence for assessments made on the 1650‚ ensuring evaluations are based on documented observations and corrective actions. It demonstrates a proactive approach to addressing issues before they escalate.

Essentially‚ the 1616/25 is a tool for ongoing feedback‚ while the 1650 is a periodic summary; both are crucial for a comprehensive record of a Sailor’s performance and potential.

Edible Forms and Digital Accessibility

Historically‚ the NAVPERS 1616/25 existed primarily as a physical‚ “edible” form – meaning it was filled out by hand. However‚ the evolving digital landscape of the Navy has prompted a search for fillable versions‚ though official availability remains inconsistent as of December 24‚ 2025.

The lack of a readily accessible‚ official digital form presents challenges. Sailors and counselors may resort to unofficial templates‚ raising concerns about standardization and data security. MyNavyHR is the primary source‚ but currently doesn’t list it.

Increased digital accessibility is vital for streamlined record-keeping and efficient counseling processes‚ aligning with the Navy’s broader modernization efforts. The need for a sanctioned‚ digital NAVPERS 1616/25 is apparent.

Navy Counseling Chit: Evolution and Modern Alternatives

The NAVPERS 1616/25‚ often termed a “counseling chit‚” represents a longstanding practice in Navy personnel management. Its origins lie in a need for documented‚ informal counseling sessions addressing performance‚ behavior‚ or personal issues. However‚ the cancellation of MILSPERMAN 1910-204 signals an evolution.

Modern alternatives are emerging‚ potentially integrated within digital platforms like MyNavyHR‚ offering more comprehensive tracking and reporting capabilities. These systems aim to streamline the counseling process and enhance data analysis.

While the traditional chit served a purpose‚ the Navy is moving towards more integrated and accessible solutions. The future may see a phasing out of the physical form in favor of digital alternatives‚ improving efficiency and accountability.

Finding Fillable Versions of the Form (If Available)

Locating a currently official‚ fillable NAVPERS 1616/25 form proves challenging as of December 24‚ 2025. The NAVPERS form library on MyNavyHR does not presently list it‚ reflecting its ambiguous status post-MILSPERMAN 1910-204 cancellation.

Unofficial sources may offer downloadable PDF versions‚ but their legality and acceptability for official use are questionable. Utilizing such forms carries risk‚ as they may not align with current Navy regulations.

Personnel should prioritize checking with their local leadership or administrative departments for guidance. If a fillable version is required‚ confirmation of its validity from an official source is crucial before use‚ ensuring compliance and accurate record-keeping.

Navpers 1616 and the Broader Navy Evaluation System (E1-E6)

The NAVPERS 1616/25‚ though its official status is currently unclear‚ historically served as a vital component within the Navy’s evaluation system for enlisted personnel E1-E6. It documented counseling sessions addressing performance‚ training‚ and personal conduct – factors directly influencing evaluations.

Properly completed chits provided concrete evidence of efforts to correct deficiencies or enhance strengths‚ supporting a fair and accurate assessment of a Sailor’s contributions.

While the form’s role may be evolving‚ the underlying principle of documented counseling remains critical for effective performance management and a robust evaluation process‚ ensuring transparency and opportunity for growth.

Resources for Further Information and Updates

Given the evolving status of NAVPERS 1616/25‚ staying informed requires utilizing multiple Navy resources. MyNavyHR remains the primary portal for official forms and policy updates‚ though direct listing of this form is currently absent.

Consulting your local chain of command and training departments is crucial‚ as local instructions may supersede general guidance. Reviewing MILSPERMAN 1070-320 provides context regarding current counseling procedures.

Furthermore‚ actively monitoring official Navy administrative messages (NAVADMINS) and seeking clarification from career counselors will ensure adherence to the most up-to-date regulations concerning enlisted counseling and documentation.

Potential Future Changes and Updates to Counseling Procedures

Considering the recent shifts surrounding NAVPERS 1616/25 and the cancellation of MILSPERMAN 1910-204‚ future changes to Navy counseling procedures are highly probable. The Navy continually evaluates administrative processes for efficiency and effectiveness.

Expect potential integration of digital counseling platforms‚ streamlining documentation and accessibility. Updates to MILSPERMAN 1070-320 will likely reflect any formal changes‚ clarifying expectations for both sailors and counselors.

Proactive monitoring of NAVADMINS and engagement with career counselors will be essential to adapt to evolving requirements‚ ensuring consistent and compliant counseling practices throughout the fleet.

Similar Posts

Leave a Reply